|
 |
 |
Doctor's Negligence in Laparoscopic Procedure
Our Case *
This medical malpractice action arises from the negligent
treatment rendered to Sarah Foster by defendants beginning
on February 26, 2001. Sarah was thirty-five (35) years
old when she entered the Hospital for a laparoscopic
procedure to remove gallstones. Dr. Sharp had recommended
the procedure and informed Sarah that he would personally
do the surgery. During the procedure, Ms. Foster sustained
a severe and permanent injury to her biliary tract
that necessitated multiple subsequent surgeries and
hospitalizations.
Finally, on March 2, 2001 an ERCP was performed which revealed clips crossing
the proximal common duct with common duct obstruction. On March 3, 2001, Ms.
Foster endured yet another surgery where extensive injuries to the bile duct
were visualized, but non-repairable. Following this procedure, Ms. Foster endured
an external drainage system where she was forced to live with 6-9 heavy drainage
bags hanging from her body for many months.
Ms. Foster subsequently developed infection in July of 2001 that required hospitalization.
She endured yet another surgery on July 12, 2001. Following that procedure, Ms.
Foster developed cholangitis and required additional hospitalization in August
2001. As the July procedure did not obviate the need for the external drainage
system, Ms. Foster endured the tubes until they could be removed in December
2001. Ms. Foster is now permanently disabled and has a poor prognosis for her
future well-being.
Why were Defendants Negligent?
The defendant physicians severely and permanently injured Ms. Foster's biliary
tract during the February 26, 2001 surgery, essentially destroying her proximal
bile duct. Additionally, following the surgery, not one attending physician was
in charge of Ms. Foster's care. The operating physicians abandoned Ms. Foster
after negligently creating her life threatening condition.
The Verdict
The Lewis Law Firm were able to recover a large monetary award
as a result of settlement prior to trial. The battle was far from easy but the
reward Ms. Foster received was well worth the effort. At the Law Offices of Gayle
R. Lewis, we go to battle for you.
* Names have been changed where appropriate
|
| |
|
|
 |
 |
Jury Verdict – 30 Million
In 2006, a Philadelphia jury awarded $30 million the largest verdict seen in the First Judicial District in years. Read more...
A verdict totaling $9,000,000 awarded for recent case involving cutting of a urological organ and ultimate kidney loss. Read more...
$4,500,000 verdict awarded for migraine drug interaction. Read more...
A Not-So-Silent Killer
Activists won a fight to have the medical establishment recognize that ovarian cancer has early symptoms. But that is only half the battle. Read more...
Wrong Dosages administered daily
The Philadelphia Inquirer
July 21, 2006
A new report says that hospital patients fall victim to medication mistakes every day. Read
more...
FDA looks into Bayer’s handling of Baycol recall. Read more...
The Truth About the Medical Malpractice Crisis
If claimants are having such a hard time winning even valid claims, one has to wonder why insurance premiums are so high for good doctors. The truth is that the insurance companies have been guilty of overcharging the medical community on premium rates. Read
more...
Gayle Lewis Fights to Preserve the Justice System Before the Pennsylvania
Supreme Court. Read more...
Taking It to Heart
First lady Laura Bush is vibrant in a black pantsuit adorned with a tiny red enameled pin in the shape of a woman’s dress, the symbol of the national Heart Truth education campaign. Read more...
It’s Never Over ‘Til It’s Over
In a speech late last year, Governor Ed Rendell declared that the medical malpractice “crisis” in Pennsylvania was over. Read more... |
| |
|
|